Housing First Impact on Costs and Associated Cost Offsets: A Review of the Literature.

TitleHousing First Impact on Costs and Associated Cost Offsets: A Review of the Literature.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsLy A, Latimer E
JournalCan J Psychiatry
Volume60
Issue11
Pagination475-87
Date Published2015 Nov
ISSN1497-0015
KeywordsCanada, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Services Needs and Demand, Homeless Persons, Hospitalization, Housing, Humans, Jurisprudence, Mental Disorders, United States
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Housing First (HF) programs for people who are chronically or episodically homeless, combining rapid access to permanent housing with community-based, integrated treatment, rehabilitation and support services, are rapidly expanding in North America and Europe. Overall costs of services use by homeless people can be considerable, suggesting the potential for significant cost offsets with HF programs. Our purpose was to provide an updated literature review, from 2007 to the present, focusing specifically on the cost offsets of HF programs.METHOD: A systematic review was performed on MEDLINE and PsycINFO as well as Google and the Homeless Hub for grey literature. Study characteristics and key findings were extracted from identified studies. Where available, impact on service cost associated with HF (increase or decrease) and net impact on overall costs, taking into account the cost of HF intervention, were noted.RESULTS: Twelve published studies (4 randomized studies and 8 quasi-experimental) and 22 unpublished studies were retained. Shelter and emergency department costs decreased with HF, while impacts on hospitalization and justice costs are more ambiguous. Studies using a pre-post design reported a net decrease in overall costs with HF. In contrast, experimental studies reported a net increase in overall costs with HF.CONCLUSIONS: While our review casts doubt on whether HF programs can be expected to pay for themselves, the certainty of significant cost offsets, combined with their benefits for participants, means that they represent a more efficient allocation of resources than traditional services.

DOI10.1177/070674371506001103
Alternate JournalCan J Psychiatry
PubMed ID26720505
PubMed Central IDPMC4679128