Le Centre de recherche Douglas
Published on Le Centre de recherche Douglas (https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca)

Accueil > Potential of Low Dose Leuco-Methylthioninium Bis(Hydromethanesulphonate) (LMTM) Monotherapy for Treatment of Mild Alzheimer's Disease: Cohort Analysis as Modified Primary Outcome in a Phase III Clinical Trial.

Potential of Low Dose Leuco-Methylthioninium Bis(Hydromethanesulphonate) (LMTM) Monotherapy for Treatment of Mild Alzheimer's Disease: Cohort Analysis as Modified Primary Outcome in a Phase III Clinical Trial.

TitlePotential of Low Dose Leuco-Methylthioninium Bis(Hydromethanesulphonate) (LMTM) Monotherapy for Treatment of Mild Alzheimer's Disease: Cohort Analysis as Modified Primary Outcome in a Phase III Clinical Trial.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsWilcock GK [1], Gauthier S [2], Frisoni GB [3], Jia J [4], Hardlund JH [5], Moebius HJ [6], Bentham P [7], Kook KA [8], Schelter BO [9], Wischik DJ [10], Davis CS [11], Staff RT [12], Vuksanovic V [13], Ahearn T [14], Bracoud L [15], Shamsi K [16], Marek K [17], Seibyl J [18], Riedel G [19], Storey JMD [20], Harrington CR [21], Wischik CM [22]
JournalJ Alzheimers Dis
Volume61
Issue1
Pagination435-457
Date Published2018
ISSN1875-8908
Abstract

BACKGROUND: LMTM is being developed as a treatment for AD based on inhibition of tau aggregation.OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of LMTM as monotherapy in non-randomized cohort analyses as modified primary outcomes in an 18-month Phase III trial in mild AD.METHODS: Mild AD patients (n = 800) were randomly assigned to 100 mg twice a day or 4 mg twice a day. Prior to unblinding, the Statistical Analysis Plan was revised to compare the 100 mg twice a day as monotherapy subgroup (n = 79) versus 4 mg twice a day as randomized (n = 396), and 4 mg twice a day as monotherapy (n = 76) versus 4 mg twice a day as add-on therapy (n = 297), with strong control of family-wise type I error.RESULTS: The revised analyses were statistically significant at the required threshold of p < 0.025 in both comparisons for change in ADAS-cog, ADCS-ADL, MRI atrophy, and glucose uptake. The brain atrophy rate was initially typical of mild AD in both add-on and monotherapy groups, but after 9 months of treatment, the rate in monotherapy patients declined significantly to that reported for normal elderly controls. Differences in severity or diagnosis at baseline between monotherapy and add-on patients did not account for significant differences in favor of monotherapy.CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with earlier studies in supporting the hypothesis that LMTM might be effective as monotherapy and that 4 mg twice a day may serve as well as higher doses. A further suitably randomized trial is required to test this hypothesis.

DOI10.3233/JAD-170560 [23]
Alternate JournalJ. Alzheimers Dis.
PubMed ID29154277 [24]
PubMed Central IDPMC5734125

Source URL: https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/potential-low-dose-leuco-methylthioninium-bishydromethanesulphonate-lmtm-monotherapy-treatment-mild

Links
[1] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7230
[2] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=3986
[3] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=4543
[4] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=3978
[5] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7231
[6] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7232
[7] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7233
[8] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7234
[9] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7236
[10] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7235
[11] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7237
[12] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7238
[13] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=9239
[14] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=9240
[15] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7239
[16] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7240
[17] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=9241
[18] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=9242
[19] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=9243
[20] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7241
[21] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7242
[22] https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/fr/publications?f%5Bauthor%5D=7243
[23] http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170560
[24] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29154277?dopt=Abstract